[Fw_Os_Forum] possible UEFI vs ACPI documentation disagreement/improvement suggestions

[Doran, Mark]

Hi Rudolf:

Sorry -- this is my fault really.  Your message arrived during the US
holiday at a time when we didn't have work group meetings for a couple of
weeks straight.  Dong forwarded your questions to the group's internal
mailing list.  I have seen no replies from subject matter experts as yet.
As a result, I was planning to put it on the agenda for the meeting that we
did have for the work group last week.  Unfortunately it slipped my mind to
include that item so we didn't discuss it yet.

Suffice it to say: you are asking in the right place.  Reminder are good --
you are welcome to nag me by direct email about this.  We just need to get
on with it for you.

--
Cheers,
 
Mark.
 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fw_os_forum-bounces at mailman.uefi.org [mailto:fw_os_forum-
> bounces at mailman.uefi.org] On Behalf Of Rudolf Marek
> Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:48 AM
> To: fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org
> Subject: Re: [Fw_Os_Forum] possible UEFI vs ACPI documentation
> disagreement/improvement suggestions
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I failed to get any answer about the ACPI document issues from
> mark.doran at intel.com, dong.wei at hp.com which I found on the UEFI pages
> as advised. Is there another way to contact the ACPI board somehow?
> 
> Thanks
> Rudolf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Fw_os_forum mailing list
> Fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org
> http://lists.mailman.uefi.org/mailman/listinfo/fw_os_forum
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/pkcs7-signature
Size: 6283 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.mailman.uefi.org/pipermail/fw_os_forum/attachments/20160721/1a49f9ee/attachment.p7s>