From r.marek at assembler.cz Thu Jul 21 08:48:24 2016 From: r.marek at assembler.cz (Rudolf Marek) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:48:24 +0200 Subject: [Fw_Os_Forum] possible UEFI vs ACPI documentation disagreement/improvement suggestions In-Reply-To: <577F75BB.8000708@assembler.cz> References: <577588C6.4060208@assembler.cz> <8171FE3654CB2B4390970F4DF50BAD23769052@msmail.insydesw.com.tw> <577F75BB.8000708@assembler.cz> Message-ID: <5790C498.8020206@assembler.cz> Hi all, I failed to get any answer about the ACPI document issues from mark.doran at intel.com, dong.wei at hp.com which I found on the UEFI pages as advised. Is there another way to contact the ACPI board somehow? Thanks Rudolf From mark.doran at intel.com Thu Jul 21 11:56:43 2016 From: mark.doran at intel.com (Doran, Mark) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 15:56:43 +0000 Subject: [Fw_Os_Forum] possible UEFI vs ACPI documentation disagreement/improvement suggestions In-Reply-To: <5790C498.8020206@assembler.cz> References: <577588C6.4060208@assembler.cz> <8171FE3654CB2B4390970F4DF50BAD23769052@msmail.insydesw.com.tw> <577F75BB.8000708@assembler.cz> <5790C498.8020206@assembler.cz> Message-ID: Hi Rudolf: Sorry -- this is my fault really. Your message arrived during the US holiday at a time when we didn't have work group meetings for a couple of weeks straight. Dong forwarded your questions to the group's internal mailing list. I have seen no replies from subject matter experts as yet. As a result, I was planning to put it on the agenda for the meeting that we did have for the work group last week. Unfortunately it slipped my mind to include that item so we didn't discuss it yet. Suffice it to say: you are asking in the right place. Reminder are good -- you are welcome to nag me by direct email about this. We just need to get on with it for you. -- Cheers, ? Mark. ? > -----Original Message----- > From: fw_os_forum-bounces at mailman.uefi.org [mailto:fw_os_forum- > bounces at mailman.uefi.org] On Behalf Of Rudolf Marek > Sent: Thursday, July 21, 2016 5:48 AM > To: fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org > Subject: Re: [Fw_Os_Forum] possible UEFI vs ACPI documentation > disagreement/improvement suggestions > > Hi all, > > I failed to get any answer about the ACPI document issues from > mark.doran at intel.com, dong.wei at hp.com which I found on the UEFI pages > as advised. Is there another way to contact the ACPI board somehow? > > Thanks > Rudolf > > _______________________________________________ > Fw_os_forum mailing list > Fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org > http://lists.mailman.uefi.org/mailman/listinfo/fw_os_forum -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: smime.p7s Type: application/pkcs7-signature Size: 6283 bytes Desc: not available URL: From r.marek at assembler.cz Thu Jul 21 17:02:43 2016 From: r.marek at assembler.cz (Rudolf Marek) Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2016 23:02:43 +0200 Subject: [Fw_Os_Forum] possible UEFI vs ACPI documentation disagreement/improvement suggestions In-Reply-To: References: <577588C6.4060208@assembler.cz> <8171FE3654CB2B4390970F4DF50BAD23769052@msmail.insydesw.com.tw> <577F75BB.8000708@assembler.cz> <5790C498.8020206@assembler.cz> Message-ID: <3fa87469-fd4b-5f40-3bfc-662fa163bbbb@assembler.cz> Hi Mark, Many thanks you for your offer and kind feedback, I just wait until it is processed internally. If you have any further questions or something needs clarification please don't hesitate to ask. Thanks Rudolf Dne 21.7.2016 v 17:56 Doran, Mark napsal(a): > Hi Rudolf: > > Sorry -- this is my fault really. Your message arrived during the US > holiday at a time when we didn't have work group meetings for a couple of > weeks straight. Dong forwarded your questions to the group's internal > mailing list. I have seen no replies from subject matter experts as yet. > As a result, I was planning to put it on the agenda for the meeting that we > did have for the work group last week. Unfortunately it slipped my mind to > include that item so we didn't discuss it yet. > > Suffice it to say: you are asking in the right place. Reminder are good -- > you are welcome to nag me by direct email about this. We just need to get > on with it for you. > > -- > Cheers, > > Mark. >