[Fw_Os_Forum] UEFI license agreement and community-run implementations?

[Tom Rini]

On Tue, Jan 05, 2016 at 08:04:50PM +0000, Doran, Mark wrote:

> Answered separately but the short version is the Forum welcomes individual
> Adopter Members.  The main reason we put that into the mix is for support of
> unaffiliated implementers.

This seems reasonable for our goals, thanks!

> 
> --
> Cheers,
>  
> Mark.
>  
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fw_os_forum-bounces at mailman.uefi.org [mailto:fw_os_forum-
> > bounces at mailman.uefi.org] On Behalf Of Kevin Davis
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 11:33 AM
> > To: Tom Rini; fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org
> > Subject: Re: [Fw_Os_Forum] UEFI license agreement and community-run
> > implementations?
> > 
> > Tom,
> > 
> > I suggest you contact the UEFI President, Mark Doren. ( mark . doran @
> intel .
> > com )  He has the answers.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Kevin
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: fw_os_forum-bounces at mailman.uefi.org [mailto:fw_os_forum-
> > bounces at mailman.uefi.org] On Behalf Of Tom Rini
> > Sent: Tuesday, January 5, 2016 10:54 AM
> > To: fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org
> > Subject: [Fw_Os_Forum] UEFI license agreement and community-run
> implementations?
> > 
> > Hey all,
> > 
> > Putting my U-Boot custodian hat on, there are various parts of the UEFI
> > specification we would like to implement in our project.  I'm quite glad
> that
> > the specifications are freely available to read.  My question however is
> how
> > would the adopter membership agreement work for us to implement any of the
> spec?
> > Would the people that are writing the code have to work for a company that
> has
> > executed the adopter agreement?  Or is it possible to have certain
> projects
> > granted an exemption?  I assume that this question must be settled to some
> > degree for the EDK II UEFI implementation hosted by TianoCore.org.
> Thanks!
> > 
> > --
> > Tom
> > _______________________________________________
> > Fw_os_forum mailing list
> > Fw_os_forum at mailman.uefi.org
> > http://lists.mailman.uefi.org/mailman/listinfo/fw_os_forum



-- 
Tom
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: Digital signature
URL: <http://lists.mailman.uefi.org/pipermail/fw_os_forum/attachments/20160105/1bd8b833/attachment.sig>